Memorandum for Respondent
목차 LIST OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF AUTHORITIES LIST OF CASES AND AWARDS LIST OF LEGAL SOURCES ARGUMENT 본문 Ⅰ. Statement of facts Ⅱ. RESPONDENT should be exempted A. Specialty Devices is not considered as the “third person whom he has engaged to perform” under Art.79(2) [ⅰ]Burden of proof [ⅱ] Supplier is not the third person [ⅲ]The cases that Art. 79(2) apply B. Examination of each requirement specified under Art.79(1) - Relationship between Paras. 2) and 3) is “or” C.What does it mean specifically by “beyond his control”? 본문내용 T OF CASES AND AWARDS LIST OF LEGAL SOURCES ARGUMENT Ⅰ. Statement of facts Ⅱ. RESPONDENT should be exempted A. Specialty Devices is not considered as the “third person whom he has engaged to perform” under Art.79(2) [ⅰ]Burden of proof [ⅱ] Supplier is not the third person [ⅲ]The cases that Art. 79(2) apply B. Examination of each requirement specified under Art.79(1) - Relationship between Paras. 2) |
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기